Throughout the course of our careers, we have consistently championed the transformative influence of education in promoting environmental and social justice as ways to improve people’s lives and advance a more equitable society, albeit from different perspectives.
More than anything, these professional paths — one focused on DEI and the other on the natural environment — address the significance and centrality of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in advancing social and ecological justice by holding a broad view of planetary justice. This approach emphasizes kinship among all human beings as well as with our non-human relatives. Making relatives with one another and the world around us means we have an obligation to one another and to the natural world that we share. DEI work, for example, cannot be done in isolation, as it is not the duty of the single diversity officer or their office. Rather, it is a deep unabating commitment that requires the collective will of an institution to hold itself accountable to these higher ideals.
Both DEI and environmental work can create the conditions for individuals and organizations to engage with one another, as well as the world that envelops us, through the portal of self-discovery. In doing so, people in community together become the connective tissue that empowers each of us to address the intractable issues of our time. Human beings can take action on these issues through our collective wisdom and commitment, which ultimately can bring forth and unleash our human potential for a greater good.
Another example, a central international aspect of environmental policy was the early recognition that negative environmental impacts fall disproportionately on those most vulnerable in the world. This pertains specifically to poorer countries that receive the world’s cast-off items, ranging from such items as computers, fast-fashion clothing, and garbage up to nuclear waste. As is the case globally, so it is within the United States. A recent study found that communities of color are likely to be more polluted and downwind of pollution sources (Professor Julian Marshall quoted in The Guardian, March 8, 2023). A stark example of this fact is that the most polluted air in the country is in Bakersfield, California, specifically the eastern section, which was one of the only parts of the city that Black people could live due to redlining and other forms of racism.
The intersection of social and ecological justice stems from the idea that inequity is born from the same flawed set of assumptions: that some people are “less than,” which creates fertile ground for prejudice and the -isms to take root; and that humans are better than other species, which gives rise to factory farming.
To describe this type of structural inequality, the term environmental justice was introduced — meant to reveal such inequities and seek to redress them. Dr. Robert Bullard, a distinguished professor of urban studies and environmental policy at Texas Southern University, is credited with coining this term. At the essence of his considerable scholarship is a premise of social justice. He calls upon us to use such research to reduce environmental, social, racial, and health disparities.
Other scholars, such as Vandana Shiva, have reminded us of the essential disconnect of the modern world. We have severed our being from the natural world, and this severing has resulted in gross injustice, not only for human beings. It also includes all species subjected to our actions of overusing our resources in a finite world. The indigenous scholar Robin Wall Kimmerer has noted, if we treated all as if we were truly “kin,” we would be going back to an ancient wisdom that creates a more harmonious balance among people and between peoples and the natural world.